library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
path = "files/CH-072 Fibonacci sequence .xlsx"
test = read_excel(path, range = "B1:B19") %>% pull()
fibonacci <- function(n) {
if (n == 1) {
return(c(0))
} else if (n == 2) {
return(c(0, 1))
} else {
fib_sequence <- accumulate(3:n, .init = c(0, 1), ~ c(.x, .x[length(.x)] + .x[length(.x) - 1]))
return(unlist(fib_sequence[n - 1]))
}
}
identical(fibonacci(18), test)
# [1] TRUE
fibonacci1 <- function(n) {
fib_sequence <- numeric(n)
fib_sequence[1] <- 0
if (n > 1) {
fib_sequence[2] <- 1
}
if (n > 2) {
map(3:n, ~ {
fib_sequence[.x] <<- fib_sequence[.x - 1] + fib_sequence[.x - 2]
})
}
return(fib_sequence)
}
identical(fibonacci1(18), test)
# [1] TRUEOmid - Challenge 72
data-challenges
advanced-exercises
🔰 Challenge 72 : Fibonacci sequence!

Challenge Description
🔰 Challenge 72 : Fibonacci sequence!
Solutions
Logic:
- Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook rule and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the sheet structure and source ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The strongest part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate representation before shaping the final output.
import pandas as pd
path = "CH-072 Fibonacci sequence .xlsx"
test = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="B").values.tolist()
test = [item for sublist in test for item in sublist]
def fibonacci_memo(n, memo={0: 0, 1: 1}):
if n not in memo:
memo[n] = fibonacci_memo(n - 1, memo) + fibonacci_memo(n - 2, memo)
return memo[n]
def generate_fibonacci_sequence(N):
return [fibonacci_memo(i) for i in range(N)]
result = generate_fibonacci_sequence(18)
print(result == test) # TrueLogic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Applies the rule iteratively until the output stabilizes
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same rule in a direct dataframe-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout remains stable, so any sheet redesign would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the original workbook rule instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is moderate:
- The business rule is readable, but the workbook still requires careful implementation to reach the expected layout.