library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
input = read_excel("files/CH-065 Transformation.xlsx", range = "B2:D6")
test = read_excel("files/CH-065 Transformation.xlsx", range = "F2:G12")
result = input %>%
mutate(seq = map2(From, TO, ~seq.POSIXt(.x, .y, by = "day")),
len = map(seq, ~length(.x)),
`AVG Cost` = map2_dbl(len, Cost, ~ .y / .x)) %>%
select(-c(From, TO, len, Cost)) %>%
unnest(cols = c(seq)) %>%
select(Date = seq, `AVG Cost`)
identical(result, test)
# [1] TRUEOmid - Challenge 65
data-challenges
advanced-exercises
🔰 Transformation In the question table, the total costs for different date ranges are provided.

Challenge Description
🔰 Transformation In the question table, the total costs for different date ranges are provided.
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Builds the intermediate columns that drive the final result
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook rule and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the sheet structure and source ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The strongest part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate representation before shaping the final output.
import pandas as pd
input = pd.read_excel("CH-065 Transformation.xlsx", sheet_name="Sheet1", usecols="B:D", skiprows=1, nrows = 4)
test = pd.read_excel("CH-065 Transformation.xlsx", sheet_name="Sheet1", usecols="F:G", skiprows=1, nrows = 10)
result = input.assign(seq = input.apply(lambda row: pd.date_range(start=row['From'], end=row['TO'], freq='D'), axis=1),
len = (input['TO'] - input['From'] + pd.Timedelta(days=1)).dt.days,
avg_cost = input['Cost'] / ((input['TO'] - input['From'] + pd.Timedelta(days=1)).dt.days))\
.explode('seq')\
.drop(columns=['From', 'TO', 'len', 'Cost'])\
.rename(columns={'seq': 'Date', 'avg_cost': 'AVG Cost'})\
.astype({'AVG Cost': 'int64'})\
.reset_index(drop=True)
print(result.equals(test)) # TrueLogic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Builds the intermediate columns that drive the final result
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same rule in a direct dataframe-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout remains stable, so any sheet redesign would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the original workbook rule instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is moderate:
- The business rule is readable, but the workbook still requires careful implementation to reach the expected layout.