library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
library(glue)
path = "300-399/326/CH-326 Custom Grouping.xlsx"
input = read_excel(path, range = "B2:E11")
test = read_excel(path, range = "I2:J5")
result = input %>%
mutate(
min_char = pmin(From, To),
max_char = pmax(From, To)) %>%
mutate(Group = glue("{min_char}{max_char} or {max_char}{min_char}")) %>%
summarise(`Total Sales` = sum(Sales), .by = Group)
all.equal(result$`Total Sales`, test$`Total Sales`)
# Values in provided solution not correct.
# group names are different, because of my choiceOmid - Challenge 326
data-challenges
advanced-exercises
🔰 Group Challenge 326: Custom Grouping!

Challenge Description
🔰 Group Challenge 326: Custom Grouping!
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Aggregates or ranks values at the relevant grouping level
Builds the intermediate columns that drive the final result
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook rule and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the sheet structure and source ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The strongest part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate representation before shaping the final output.
import pandas as pd
path = "300-399/326/CH-326 Custom Grouping.xlsx"
input = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="B:E", nrows=9, skiprows=1)
test = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="I:J", nrows=3, skiprows=1)
input["min_char"] = input[["From", "To"]].min(axis=1)
input["max_char"] = input[["From", "To"]].max(axis=1)
input["Group"] = (
input["min_char"] + input["max_char"] + " or " +
input["max_char"] + input["min_char"]
)
result = (
input
.groupby("Group", as_index=False)
.agg({"Sales": "sum"})
.rename(columns={"Sales": "Total Sales"})
)
print(result["Total Sales"].equals(test["Total Sales"]))
# values provided were not correct.
# names provided are done using pattern that was not done in provided valuesLogic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Aggregates or ranks values at the relevant grouping level
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same rule in a direct dataframe-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout remains stable, so any sheet redesign would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the original workbook rule instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is moderate:
- The business rule is readable, but the workbook still requires careful implementation to reach the expected layout.