library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
path = "files/CH-003.xlsx"
input = read_excel(path, range = "B2:C7")
test = read_excel(path, range = "H2:I33")
# map on sequence 1:5 combn on input$ID
result = map(1:5, ~combn(input$ID, .x, simplify = FALSE)) %>%
flatten() %>%
imap(function(sublist, parent_idx) {
data.frame(parent_index = parent_idx,ID = sublist) %>%
pivot_longer(-parent_index)
}) %>%
bind_rows() %>%
left_join(input, by = c("value" = "ID")) %>%
summarise(`ID Combination` = paste(value, collapse = ","),
`Total value (cost)` = sum(`value (cost)`),
.by = parent_index) %>%
select(-parent_index)
identical(result, test)Omid - Challenge 3
data-challenges
advanced-exercises
🔰 Extract all possible combinations of ID and result in the right-side table.

Challenge Description
🔰 Extract all possible combinations of ID and result in the right-side table.
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Reshapes the data into the grain required by the task
Aggregates or ranks values at the relevant grouping level
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook rule and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the sheet structure and source ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The strongest part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate representation before shaping the final output.
import itertools
import pandas as pd
path = "CH-003.xlsx"
input_data = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="B:C", skiprows=1, nrows=6)
test = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="H:I", skiprows=1, nrows=32)
rows = []
ids = input_data["ID"].tolist()
costs = dict(zip(input_data["ID"], input_data["value (cost)"]))
for r in range(1, len(ids) + 1):
for combo in itertools.combinations(ids, r):
rows.append({
"ID Combination": ",".join(combo),
"Total value (cost)": sum(costs[i] for i in combo),
})
result = pd.DataFrame(rows)
print(result.equals(test))Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Applies the rule iteratively until the output stabilizes
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same rule in a direct dataframe-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout remains stable, so any sheet redesign would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the original workbook rule instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is moderate:
The core logic is clear, but the correct transformation pattern is not obvious from the raw input.
The challenge combines multiple reshaping, grouping, or parsing steps.