library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
path = "files/200-299/230/CH-230 Project scheduling.xlsx"
test = read_excel(path, range = "F2:H11") %>%
mutate(across(c(Start, Finish), ~ as.Date(.x, origin = "1899-12-30")))
input = read_excel(path, range = "B3:D11", col_names = c('id', 'dur', 'pred'))
parse_rel <- function(x) {
str_remove_all(x, " days?") %>%
str_split(",", simplify = FALSE) %>%
unlist() %>%
map_dfr(
~ {
m <- str_match(.x, "(\\d+)(FS|FF)?(?:\\+([0-9]+))?")
pred <- as.integer(m[2])
type <- ifelse(is.na(m[3]), "FS", m[3])
lag <- as.integer(m[4])
lag <- replace_na(lag, 0L)
tibble(pred, type, lag)
}
)
}
input <- input %>%
mutate(
start = as.Date(NA),
finish = as.Date(NA)
) %>%
arrange(id)
input$start[input$id == 1] <- ymd("2025-04-01")
input$finish[input$id == 1] <- input$start[input$id == 1] +
days(input$dur[input$id == 1] - 1)
while (any(is.na(input$start))) {
walk(input$id[is.na(input$start)], function(i) {
if (is.na(input$pred[i])) return()
rels <- parse_rel(input$pred[i])
if (!all(rels$pred %in% input$id[!is.na(input$finish)])) return()
cand_st <- rels %>%
mutate(
st = case_when(
type == "FS" ~ input$finish[pred] + days(lag + 1),
type == "FF" ~
(input$finish[pred] + days(lag)) - days(input$dur[i] - 1)
)
) %>%
pull(st)
st_i <- max(cand_st)
input$start[i] <<- st_i
input$finish[i] <<- st_i + days(input$dur[i] - 1)
})
}
result = input %>%
select(`Task Name` = id, Start = start, Finish = finish)
all.equal(test, result, check.attributes = FALSE)Omid - Challenge 230

Challenge Description
🔰 Based on this information, and assuming Task 1 starts on 1/4/2025, calculate the start and finish dates for all the tasks.
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Builds the intermediate columns that drive the final result
Parses the text patterns directly instead of relying on manual cleanup
Applies the rule iteratively until the output stabilizes
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook rule and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the sheet structure and source ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The strongest part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate representation before shaping the final output.
import re
import pandas as pd
path = "CH-230 Project scheduling.xlsx"
test = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="F:H", skiprows=1, nrows=10)
input_data = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="B:D", skiprows=2, nrows=9, names=["id", "dur", "pred"])
def parse_rel(text):
parts = []
for item in re.sub(r" days?", "", str(text)).split(","):
item = item.strip()
if not item or item == "nan":
continue
m = re.fullmatch(r"(\d+)(FS|FF)?(?:\+(\d+))?", item)
pred = int(m.group(1))
rel_type = m.group(2) or "FS"
lag = int(m.group(3) or 0)
parts.append((pred, rel_type, lag))
return parts
input_data = input_data.sort_values("id").reset_index(drop=True)
input_data["start"] = pd.NaT
input_data["finish"] = pd.NaT
mask = input_data["id"] == 1
input_data.loc[mask, "start"] = pd.Timestamp("2025-04-01")
input_data.loc[mask, "finish"] = input_data.loc[mask, "start"] + pd.to_timedelta(input_data.loc[mask, "dur"] - 1, unit="D")
while input_data["start"].isna().any():
progress = False
for idx, row in input_data[input_data["start"].isna()].iterrows():
if pd.isna(row["pred"]):
continue
rels = parse_rel(row["pred"])
known = input_data.dropna(subset=["finish"]).set_index("id")
if not all(pred in known.index for pred, _, _ in rels):
continue
starts = []
for pred, rel_type, lag in rels:
pred_finish = known.loc[pred, "finish"]
if rel_type == "FS":
st = pred_finish + pd.Timedelta(days=lag + 1)
else:
st = (pred_finish + pd.Timedelta(days=lag)) - pd.Timedelta(days=row["dur"] - 1)
starts.append(st)
st = max(starts)
input_data.loc[idx, "start"] = st
input_data.loc[idx, "finish"] = st + pd.Timedelta(days=row["dur"] - 1)
progress = True
if not progress:
break
result = input_data[["id", "start", "finish"]].rename(columns={"id": "Task Name", "start": "Start", "finish": "Finish"})
print(result.equals(test))Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Parses the text patterns directly instead of relying on manual cleanup
Applies the rule iteratively until the output stabilizes
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same rule in a direct dataframe-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout remains stable, so any sheet redesign would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the original workbook rule instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is moderate to challenging:
It depends on a non-trivial iterative or rule-based transformation.
Getting the expected output requires more than one straightforward dataframe step.