library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
path = "files/CH-204 Custom Grouping.xlsx"
input = read_excel(path, range = "B2:C19")
test = read_excel(path, range = "H2:J19")
result = input %>%
mutate(Group = accumulate(Cost,
~ if (.x$sum + .y > 150 | .x$count == 3)
list(sum = .y, count = 1, group = .x$group + 1)
else
list(sum = .x$sum + .y, count = .x$count + 1, group = .x$group),
.init = list(sum = 0, count = 0, group = 1)
)[-1] %>% map_int("group"))
# Solution has differences in Cost so Groups are not matching.Omid - Challenge 204
data-challenges
advanced-exercises
🔰 Group Custom Grouping Group the rows from top which in each group the total cost be lower than 150$ and each group includes up to three rows.

Challenge Description
🔰 Group Custom Grouping Group the rows from top which in each group the total cost be lower than 150$ and each group includes up to three rows.
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Builds the intermediate columns that drive the final result
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook rule and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the sheet structure and source ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The strongest part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate representation before shaping the final output.
import pandas as pd
from itertools import accumulate
path = "CH-204 Custom Grouping.xlsx"
input = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="B:C", skiprows=1, nrows=17)
test = pd.read_excel(path, usecols="H:J", skiprows=1, nrows=17)
def accumulate_groups(costs):
groups, acc_sum, acc_count, group = [], 0, 0, 1
for cost in costs:
if acc_sum + cost > 150 or acc_count == 3:
group += 1
acc_sum, acc_count = cost, 1
else:
acc_sum += cost
acc_count += 1
groups.append(group)
return groups
input['Group'] = accumulate_groups(input['Cost'])
print(input)Logic:
Reads the workbook ranges needed for the challenge
Applies the rule iteratively until the output stabilizes
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same rule in a direct dataframe-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout remains stable, so any sheet redesign would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the original workbook rule instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is moderate:
- The business rule is readable, but the workbook still requires careful implementation to reach the expected layout.