library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
input = read_excel("Power Query/PQ_Challenge_183.xlsx", range = "A1:F5")
test = read_excel("Power Query/PQ_Challenge_183.xlsx", range = "H1:K24") %>%
mutate(Rental = as.integer(Rental))
result = input %>%
unite("OYQ", Year, Quarter, sep = " ") %>%
mutate(OYQ = yq(OYQ)) %>%
rowwise() %>%
mutate(quarters = list(seq.Date(from = as.Date(OYQ), by = "quarter", length.out = `Total Periods`))) %>%
ungroup() %>%
unnest(quarters) %>%
mutate(Year = year(quarters),
Quarter = paste0("Q",quarter(quarters)),
rn = row_number(),
roll_year = (rn - 1) %/% 4 ,
.by = Vendor) %>%
mutate(Rental = round(Rental * (1 + `% Hike Yearly`/100)^roll_year) %>% as.integer()) %>%
select(Vendor, Year, Quarter, Rental)
identical(result, test)
# [1] TRUEExcel BI - PowerQuery Challenge 183
excel-challenges
power-query
Transpose the problem table into result table.

Challenge Description
Transpose the problem table into result table.
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook range needed for the challenge
Reshapes the data into the structure required by the result table
Builds helper columns that drive the final output
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook logic and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout and selected ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The best part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate shape before formatting the final output.
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
import numpy as np
input = pd.read_excel("PQ_Challenge_183.xlsx", nrows=4, usecols="A:F")
test = pd.read_excel("PQ_Challenge_183.xlsx", nrows=24, usecols="H:K")
test.columns = ["Vendor","Year", "Quarter", "Rental"]
test["Rental"] = test["Rental"].astype(int)
result = input.copy()
result["QuarterFM"] = np.where(result["Quarter"] == "Q1", "01", np.where(result["Quarter"] == "Q2", "04", np.where(result["Quarter"] == "Q3", "07", "10")))
result["Date"] = pd.to_datetime(result["Year"].astype(str) + result["QuarterFM"], format="%Y%m")
result = result.loc[result.index.repeat(result["Total Periods"])].reset_index(drop=True)
result["Row"] = result.groupby("Vendor").cumcount().astype(int)
result["roll_year"] = result["Row"] // 4
result = result[["Vendor", "Rental", "% Hike Yearly", "Row", "roll_year", "Date"]]
result["Date"] = result["Date"] + pd.to_timedelta(result["Row"]*3*31, unit='D')
result["Date"] = result["Date"] + pd.offsets.MonthEnd(1)
result["Year"] = result["Date"].dt.year.astype("int64")
result["Quarter"] = "Q" + result["Date"].dt.quarter.astype(str)
result["Rental"] = result["Rental"] * (1 + result["% Hike Yearly"]/100) ** result["roll_year"]
result["Rental"] = result["Rental"].round(0).astype(int)
result = result[["Vendor", "Year", "Quarter", "Rental"]]
print(result.equals(test)) # TrueLogic:
Reads the workbook range needed for the challenge
Aggregates or ranks values at the relevant grouping level
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same workbook rule in a direct pandas-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- As with the R version, any workbook layout change would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the source challenge instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is easy to moderate:
- The transformation rule is readable, but the final layout still requires a careful implementation.