library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
input = read_excel("Power Query/PQ_Challenge_176.xlsx", range = "A1:C5")
test = read_excel("Power Query/PQ_Challenge_176.xlsx", range = "E1:G9")
result = input %>%
mutate(Column1 = map(Column1, ~strsplit(.x, ", ")),
Column2 = map(Column2, ~strsplit(.x, ", "))) %>%
unnest(cols = c(Column1, Column2)) %>%
mutate(Column1 = map(Column1, ~tibble(Column1 = .x)),
Column2 = map(Column2, ~tibble(Column2 = .x))) %>%
mutate(n1 = map_dbl(Column1, ~nrow(.x)),
n2 = map_dbl(Column2, ~nrow(.x))) %>%
mutate(Column = map2(Column1, Column2, ~{
n1 = nrow(.x)
n2 = nrow(.y)
if (n1 > n2) {
.y = bind_rows(.y, tibble(Column2 = rep("0", n1 - n2)))
} else if (n1 < n2) {
.x = bind_rows(.x, tibble(Column1 = rep(NA, n2 - n1)))
}
bind_cols(.x, .y)
})) %>%
select(Group, Column) %>%
unnest(cols = c(Column)) %>%
drop_na() %>%
mutate(Column2 = cumsum(as.numeric(Column2)), .by = Group)
identical(result, test)
# [1] TRUEExcel BI - PowerQuery Challenge 176
excel-challenges
power-query
Group You will need to split column1 and get corresponding running total from Column2 and stack them in rows.

Challenge Description
Group You will need to split column1 and get corresponding running total from Column2 and stack them in rows.
Solutions
Logic:
Reads the workbook range needed for the challenge
Reshapes the data into the structure required by the result table
Builds helper columns that drive the final output
Strengths:
- The R solution stays close to the workbook logic and keeps the transformation compact.
Areas for Improvement:
- The code assumes the workbook layout and selected ranges remain stable.
Gem:
- The best part of the solution is choosing the right intermediate shape before formatting the final output.
import pandas as pd
input = pd.read_excel("PQ_Challenge_176.xlsx", sheet_name="Sheet1", usecols="A:C", nrows=4)
test = pd.read_excel("PQ_Challenge_176.xlsx", sheet_name="Sheet1", usecols="E:G", nrows=9)
test.columns = input.columns
input["Column1"] = input["Column1"].str.split(", ")
input["Column2"] = input["Column2"].str.split(", ")
result = []
for i in range(len(input)):
column1 = input["Column1"][i]
column2 = input["Column2"][i]
if len(column1) > len(column2):
column2 += ["0"]*(len(column1)-len(column2))
elif len(column2) > len(column1):
column1 += [None]*(len(column2)-len(column1))
result.append(list(zip(column1, column2)))
result = pd.DataFrame([item for sublist in result for item in sublist], columns=["Column1", "Column2"])
result = result.dropna()
groups = input[["Group", "Column1"]].explode("Column1").dropna()
merged = pd.merge(result, groups, on="Column1", how="left")
merged = merged[["Group", "Column1", "Column2"]].reset_index(drop=True)
merged["Column2"] = pd.to_numeric(merged["Column2"])
merged["Column2"] = merged.groupby("Group")["Column2"].cumsum()
print(merged.equals(test)) # TrueLogic:
Reads the workbook range needed for the challenge
Aggregates or ranks values at the relevant grouping level
Applies the rule iteratively until the output is complete
Strengths:
- The Python version follows the same workbook rule in a direct pandas-oriented implementation.
Areas for Improvement:
- As with the R version, any workbook layout change would require small adjustments.
Gem:
- The implementation stays close to the source challenge instead of adding unnecessary abstraction.
Difficulty Level
This task is easy to moderate:
- The transformation rule is readable, but the final layout still requires a careful implementation.